Fiberlogy FiberWood vs PLA
Compare Fiberlogy FiberWood and PLA filaments side-by-side so you can pick the right one for your 3D printing project.
Fiberlogy FiberWood vs PLA: Fiberlogy FiberWood is known for easiest to print, while PLA is known for easiest to print. Both have no enclosure requirements; Fiberlogy FiberWood is less moisture-sensitive; PLA prints at higher nozzle temperatures (190-220°C vs 185°C). Choose Fiberlogy FiberWood for easiest to print, or PLA for easiest to print.
Key differences at a glance
Fiberlogy FiberWood
-Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
PLA
APolylactic Acid
Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
Detailed Comparison
Green marks the generally easier or more forgiving option in that row, based on tier, enclosure needs, and moisture sensitivity. It is not always the better choice for a specific job, so weigh it against what your project actually needs.
Strengths Comparison
Fiberlogy FiberWood Strengths
- Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
- Stiff non-composite thermoplastic, good tensile strength
PLA Strengths
- Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
- Stiff non-composite thermoplastic, good tensile strength
Considerations
Fiberlogy FiberWood Caveats
- Creeps under sustained load
- Poor heat resistance, UV degradation, can shatter on drops
- Not great for sanding/gluing/painting/touch-ups
PLA Caveats
- Creeps under sustained load
- Poor heat resistance, UV degradation, can shatter on drops
- Not great for sanding/gluing/painting/touch-ups