Fiberlogy PLA Mineral vs PLA

Compare Fiberlogy PLA Mineral and PLA filaments side-by-side. See which one is best for your 3D printing project.

Detailed Comparison

Property
Fiberlogy PLA Mineral
PLA
Tier Rating
Tier null
Tier A
Family
PLA
PLA
Nozzle Temp
190°C
185-235°C
Bed Temp
60°C
50-60°C
Enclosure
not needed
not needed
Cooling
High part cooling usually beneficial
Moisture Sensitivity
low
moderate

Strengths Comparison

Fiberlogy PLA Mineral Strengths

    PLA Strengths

    • Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
    • Stiff non-composite thermoplastic, good tensile strength

    Considerations

    Fiberlogy PLA Mineral Caveats

      PLA Caveats

      • Creeps under sustained load
      • Poor heat resistance, UV degradation, can shatter on drops
      • Not great for sanding/gluing/painting/touch-ups

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is Fiberlogy PLA Mineral or PLA better for 3D printing?
      PLA is generally rated higher (Tier A) compared to Fiberlogy PLA Mineral (Tier null). However, the best choice depends on your specific needs: Fiberlogy PLA Mineral is best for various applications, while PLA is best for Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal.
      What are the temperature differences between Fiberlogy PLA Mineral and PLA?
      Fiberlogy PLA Mineral prints at 190°C nozzle / 60°C bed. PLA prints at 185-235°C nozzle / 50-60°C bed.
      Do Fiberlogy PLA Mineral and PLA need an enclosure?
      Fiberlogy PLA Mineral: not needed. PLA: not needed.
      Which is more beginner-friendly: Fiberlogy PLA Mineral or PLA?
      Both Fiberlogy PLA Mineral and PLA are beginner-friendly options.

      Other Popular Comparisons