Glass-filled Polypropylene vs ASA
Compare Glass-filled Polypropylene and ASA filaments side-by-side so you can pick the right one for your 3D printing project.
Glass-filled Polypropylene vs ASA: Glass-filled Polypropylene is known for very tough, while ASA is known for excellent uv resistance (outdoors indefinitely). ASA is easier to print; Glass-filled Polypropylene is less moisture-sensitive; ASA prints at higher nozzle temperatures (220-275°C vs 230-260°C). Choose Glass-filled Polypropylene for very tough, or ASA for excellent uv resistance (outdoors indefinitely).
Key differences at a glance
Glass-filled Polypropylene
BGFPP / PP-GF
Very tough, durable, all-weather, extremely lightweight
ASA
AAcrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate
Excellent UV resistance (outdoors indefinitely), tough, matte surface
Detailed Comparison
Green marks the generally easier or more forgiving option in that row, based on tier, enclosure needs, and moisture sensitivity. It is not always the better choice for a specific job, so weigh it against what your project actually needs.
Strengths Comparison
Glass-filled Polypropylene Strengths
- Very tough, durable, all-weather, extremely lightweight
- Industrial-relevant material properties
ASA Strengths
- Excellent UV resistance (outdoors indefinitely), tough, matte surface
- Less warping than ABS; low viscosity enables very high speed printing
- High heat tolerance (~boiling water range)
Considerations
Glass-filled Polypropylene Caveats
- Even harder to print than PP; peels/curls more aggressively
ASA Caveats
- Still off-gasses; enclosure/ventilation recommended
- Can still warp; needs tuning