PMMA vs ASA
Compare PMMA and ASA filaments side-by-side so you can pick the right one for your 3D printing project.
PMMA vs ASA: PMMA is known for best-in-class clarity, while ASA is known for excellent uv resistance (outdoors indefinitely). Both have recommended enclosure requirements; ASA prints at higher nozzle temperatures (220-275°C vs 230-260°C). Choose PMMA for best-in-class clarity, or ASA for excellent uv resistance (outdoors indefinitely).
Key differences at a glance
PMMA
CAcrylic / Plexiglass / Perspex
Best-in-class clarity; can be buffed/frosted/polished
ASA
AAcrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate
Excellent UV resistance (outdoors indefinitely), tough, matte surface
Detailed Comparison
Green marks the generally easier or more forgiving option in that row, based on tier, enclosure needs, and moisture sensitivity. It is not always the better choice for a specific job, so weigh it against what your project actually needs.
Strengths Comparison
PMMA Strengths
- Best-in-class clarity; can be buffed/frosted/polished
- Good UV resistance
- Clarity and rigidity for display parts
ASA Strengths
- Excellent UV resistance (outdoors indefinitely), tough, matte surface
- Less warping than ABS; low viscosity enables very high speed printing
- High heat tolerance (~boiling water range)
Considerations
PMMA Caveats
- Terrible bed and layer adhesion; high thermal expansion; brittle
- Prints often fail during/after
- Can crack/warp; requires tuning
ASA Caveats
- Still off-gasses; enclosure/ventilation recommended
- Can still warp; needs tuning