Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 vs ASA
Compare Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 and ASA filaments side-by-side so you can pick the right one for your 3D printing project.
Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 vs ASA: Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 is known for massively stiffer/tougher/more heat & abrasion resistant than nylon, while ASA is known for excellent uv resistance (outdoors indefinitely). Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 is easier to print; Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 prints at higher nozzle temperatures (270°C vs 220-275°C). Choose Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 for massively stiffer/tougher/more heat & abrasion resistant than nylon, or ASA for excellent uv resistance (outdoors indefinitely).
Key differences at a glance
Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15
-Massively stiffer/tougher/more heat & abrasion resistant than nylon
ASA
AAcrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate
Excellent UV resistance (outdoors indefinitely), tough, matte surface
Detailed Comparison
Green marks the generally easier or more forgiving option in that row, based on tier, enclosure needs, and moisture sensitivity. It is not always the better choice for a specific job, so weigh it against what your project actually needs.
Strengths Comparison
Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 Strengths
- Massively stiffer/tougher/more heat & abrasion resistant than nylon
- Warping reduced enough to be fairly easy to print (with correct setup)
- Viable alternative to machined aluminum for some parts
ASA Strengths
- Excellent UV resistance (outdoors indefinitely), tough, matte surface
- Less warping than ABS; low viscosity enables very high speed printing
- High heat tolerance (~boiling water range)
Considerations
Ultrafuse PAHT-CF15 Caveats
- Higher print temps; hardware wear if not equipped
ASA Caveats
- Still off-gasses; enclosure/ventilation recommended
- Can still warp; needs tuning