Ultrafuse TPU-95A vs PLA
Compare Ultrafuse TPU-95A and PLA filaments side-by-side so you can pick the right one for your 3D printing project.
Ultrafuse TPU-95A vs PLA: Ultrafuse TPU-95A is known for excellent layer adhesion, while PLA is known for easiest to print. Both have no enclosure requirements; Ultrafuse TPU-95A is less moisture-sensitive; Ultrafuse TPU-95A prints at higher nozzle temperatures (225°C vs 190-220°C). Choose Ultrafuse TPU-95A for excellent layer adhesion, or PLA for easiest to print.
Key differences at a glance
Ultrafuse TPU-95A
-Excellent layer adhesion; extremely impact resistant; highly durable
PLA
APolylactic Acid
Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
Detailed Comparison
Green marks the generally easier or more forgiving option in that row, based on tier, enclosure needs, and moisture sensitivity. It is not always the better choice for a specific job, so weigh it against what your project actually needs.
Strengths Comparison
Ultrafuse TPU-95A Strengths
- Excellent layer adhesion; extremely impact resistant; highly durable
- Great for combat robots, tactical/rough-use parts
- Rubber-like parts (gaskets, grips, bumpers, wheels)
PLA Strengths
- Easiest to print, cheap, widely available, fast, good bridges/overhangs, easy support removal
- Stiff non-composite thermoplastic, good tensile strength
Considerations
Ultrafuse TPU-95A Caveats
- Slow printing; retraction can cause jams (especially in Bowden setups)
- Stringing is common
- Very moisture sensitive; wet TPU prints poorly
PLA Caveats
- Creeps under sustained load
- Poor heat resistance, UV degradation, can shatter on drops
- Not great for sanding/gluing/painting/touch-ups